Epperly
v.
United States
A Complaint challenging the
Constitutionality of the Ratification of the
U.S. Constitution, 14th Amendment
U.S. District Court
for the District of Columbia
Federal Case
No. 90-1103-CRR |
| ----------------------- |
Epperly
v.
United States
A Complaint
challenging
the Constitutionality of the Ratification of the
U.S. Constitution, 14th Amendment
U.S. District Court
for the District of Alaska
Federal Case
No. J90-010-CV
Appeal
to
U.S. Court of Appeals
Petition for
Writ of Certiorari
U.S. Supreme Court |
| ----------------------- |
Epperly
v.
United States
A Complaint before the
United States Court of Federal Claims petitioning the
Court to investigate the ratification the
U.S. Constitution, 14th Amendment
U.S. Court
of
Federal Claims
Federal Case
No. 95-CV-281 |
| ----------------------- |
Epperly
v.
United States Archivist
Petitioning the Archivist
to investigate and correct the record to show all
the States that cast negative ratification votes on the
U.S. Const., 14th Amendment
U.S. District Court
for the District of Alaska
Federal Case
No. J97-025-CV |
| ----------------------- |
Epperly
v.
U.S. Congress (United States)
Challenging the
Constitutionality of the Reconstruction Acts
of 1867
U.S. District Court
for the District of Alaska
Federal Case
1:06-CV-00008-JWS |
| ----------------------- |
Epperly
v.
Allen Weinstein
Petition for an Order
in Nature of Mandamus to be issued upon
Allen Weinstein as Archivist of the United States
U.S. District Court
for the District of Alaska
Federal Case
1:07-CV-00011-JWS |
|
Earnest
v.
State of Alabama
This is a
pro se case which the Plaintiff objects to
the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.
This case is submitted for what Mr. Ray Earnest
has to say about the U.S. Constitution,
14th Amendment.
CV-89-0313 |
| ----------------------- |
Ex
parte McCardle
"It is quite clear,
therefore, that this court cannot proceed to pronounce judgment
in this case (cases of Habeas Corpus under the
Reconstruction Acts), for it has no longer jurisdiction
of the appeal, . . ."
Federal Court Case 74 US 506 |
| ----------------------- |
Georgia
v.
Stanton
"It is true, the
bill, in setting forth the political rights of
the State, and of its people to be protected, among other
matters, avers, that Georgia owns certain real estate
and buildings therein, and that putting the acts
of Congress (Reconstruction Acts) into
execution, and destroying the State, would deprive it of
the possession and enjoyment of
its property. . . ."
73 US 50 |
| ----------------------- |
Glassroth
v.
(Judge) Moore
This case was decided
by applying the First Article of the
Bill of Rights to the States under the purported
authority of the U.S. Constitution, 14th Amendment.
Federal Court
Case 01-T-1268-N |
| ----------------------- |
Hollingsworth
v.
Virginia
"The President of the
United States does not have to approve any Congressional
Resolution to amend the U.S. Constitution."
3 Dallus 378 |
| ----------------------- |
Mississippi
v.
Johnson
"A bill praying an
injunction against the execution of an act of Congress
(Reconstruction Acts) by the incumbent of the
presidential office cannot be received, whether it
describes him as President or as a citizen of
a State."
71 US (4 Wall)
475 |
| ----------------------- |
Texas
v. White
The Confederate States
were States before, during, and after the Civil War
74 U.S. 700 |
| ----------------------- |
Dred
Scott
v.
Sandford
- the word "citizen"
in the Constitution does not embrace one of the negro race -
60 U.S. 393 |
| ----------------------- |
Colgate
v.
Harvey
Defines the term "citizen"
as used in the U.S. Constitution, 14th Amendment.
296 U.S.
404 |
| ----------------------- |
State of Idaho
v.
Freeman
The States have a right to
rescind their votes of ratification on proposed Amendments to
the Constitution for the United States
of America.
529 F.
Supp. 1107 |
| ----------------------- |
U.S.
v.
Stahl
The question of
ratification of Constitutional Amendments is a
Political Question
792 F2d. 1438 |
| ----------------------- |
Coleman
v.
Miller
The question of
ratification of Constitutional Amendments is a Political
Question
307 U.S.
433 |
| ----------------------- |
Perry
v.
Schwarzenegger
The U.S. District Court is being asked to declare
California's Proposition 8 Un-Constitutional
No. C 09-2292
VRW |
|
Ex
Parte Knowles
A citizen of any one of
the States of the Union is held to be and called
a citizen of the United States, although technically
and abstractly there is no such thing.
5 Cal.
301 (1855) |
| ----------------------- |
Dyett
v.
Turner
The Supreme Court
for the State of Utah exposes the 14th Amendment
as a fraud.
439 P2d 266 @ 267,
20 U2d 403 |
|
